Systems
Decision-makers' guid ...
Business Report 2008
Future Press
Extreme Study Tour
Hyper Local
User groups
drupa 2008 report
Russia
Publishing Green
Mobile workflows
Search engines
Citizen journalism
Human resources
Newspaper formats
Newspaper design
Quality
Simply advertising
CRM
New markets
RFID in newspapers
Scenarios
Web 2.0
Digital printing
Newsroom reorganisation
New Media
Workflow
India Hotbed
Mailroom
Branding
Automation
Wire services
Ifra - Where publishing lives
E-mail this article Print this article Increase the font size Decrease the font size

Open fountain vs. injection: What the suppliers say


“In our opinion injectors [don’t necessarily have] a high-tech image, even if micro-mechanics and electronic boards are necessary to operate [them]. In terms of reliability, performance and productivity, other solutions are ‘high-tech’ as well.”
-- Anton Hamm, MAN Roland

“Film has trouble with speed variations. Open-fountain gains water in the process over time, and the whole ink train can become emulsified. The intensity of the image is then reduced by the displaced water.”
-- Rick Atwater, CGI

“The open-fountain systems used today are very similar to the inkers used on the highest-grade commercial inkers. The page pack or injector is favoured by some as a benefit to deliver a precise amount of ink in a closed environment.”
-- Gary Owen, KBA

“A failure of a motor-driven ink zone during night production can be solved by setting the zone manually or changing the small component quickly. Solving a malfunction in a digital inker takes much more time because of the higher complexity.”
-- Klaus Schmidt, KBA

“Open-fountain systems are a bit easier to formulate inks for. Injection systems demand much more precise management of ink viscosity.”
-- John R. Whalen, Kerley Ink

Try IFRA Magazine ePaper today!IFRA Directories 2009